Jesolo, in the receipt also the 30 cents of water for the dog
Jesolo, in the receipt also the 30 cents of water for the dog

Video: Jesolo, in the receipt also the 30 cents of water for the dog

Video: Jesolo, in the receipt also the 30 cents of water for the dog
Video: What Happened To All The Goldfish I Bought At PetSmart? 🤔🐟 #shorts #fish 2024, March
Anonim

Controversies a Jesolo: a local has beaten one receipt also inserting i 30 cents of water for the dog. We are on the beach of Jesolo: a couple is having an aperitif with their dog. The owners probably asked for water for their four-legged friend: the waiter served it to the dog in a cardboard cup. So far, so good. The problem, however, arises when the receipt arrives: the restaurant, in fact, also charged the dog 30 cents for water. Is it such a shocking thing? If you think about it, no.

The receipt, promptly published on Facebook, aroused the easy indignation of the web. Most of the comments criticize the behavior of the managers: they range from those who argue that a bowl of water should always be made available to dogs (not a wrong idea, but the choice is up to the manager), to those who consider it absurd to charge the dog. water to dogs. Inevitably, then, this thesis is associated with those relating to how unfair it is to make a child pay for a glass of water (if he is an adult, is it okay?) Or how expensive are the prices for bottles of water in some premises or locations.

Then, however, there are also voices outside the chorus. This is the case of a user who was there at the time the story took place. This user, after pointing out that everyone was wasting time and energy to discredit a family that works hard and pays taxes, explained that the 30 cents were not for water, but for cardboard cup into which the water was poured. Moreover, then, he reiterated that we must also take into account the staff work who served the dog water.

It is easy to be indignant about such a thing without knowing the facts, but is it so wrong to charge for the material used? How easily indignant people would be willing to put out of their own pocket if the positions were reversed? There is also another fact to consider: it is true, it is only 30 cents, but 30 given away here, 30 given away there, at the end of the day a commercial activity risks losing tens or hundreds of euros. How many of these "serial indignators" would agree to lose tens of euros every day from their pro bono stock salary? Every single day of the month?

If you are interested in prices and receipt items indicted, here they are:

  • dog water: 0, 30 euros
  • Cal Prosecco: 3.50 euros
  • Spritz Campari: 3.50 euros

Do you go to a club and don't want to pay for the water for the dog? Do as everyone does: bring your own water and bowls for the dog. Which would be just a common sense rule to respect when walking around with the dog.

Recommended: